tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4918867371439695874.post2303898418562771771..comments2024-03-08T04:35:34.415-08:00Comments on Stoat spam: Putting the Climate Debate In Its Proper PerspectiveWilliam M. Connolleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05836299130680534926noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4918867371439695874.post-18743351146645645172015-10-24T12:37:15.370-07:002015-10-24T12:37:15.370-07:00William Connolley | October 24, 2015 at 10:36 am |...William Connolley | October 24, 2015 at 10:36 am | Reply<br />To take an obviously entirely hypothetical example – were anyone to wonder if what you say can be relied upon, they might look upon this as a counter example.<br /><br />[Added here: this is a hint; what's its a hint about you're unlikely to work out, unless it plays out further.]William M. Connolleyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05836299130680534926noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4918867371439695874.post-57928414847756429652015-10-24T12:35:24.910-07:002015-10-24T12:35:24.910-07:00William Connolley | October 24, 2015 at 10:32 am |...William Connolley | October 24, 2015 at 10:32 am | Reply<br />> ban folks like me, sometimes even before I ever say a thing. Yes, that’s you, ATTP<br /><br />It seems odd to me that you’ve allowed this to stand, uncorrected, in your post, even though ATTP has provided links proving its falseness, and you’ve accepted its falsity.William M. Connolleyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05836299130680534926noreply@blogger.com