In House testimony, Botkin dismantles the IPCC 2014 report

Another WUWT post, In House testimony, Botkin dismantles the IPCC 2014 report.

Posted on May 31, 2014 by Anthony Watts

Botkin’s bio: “Daniel B. Botkin, a world-renowned ecologist, is Professor (Emeritus), Department of Ecology, Evolution and Marine Biology, UC Santa Barbara...

Oddly he focusses a lot of criticism on the basic climatology, rather than on the ecology, as you might expect.

Currently, Chrome doesn't much like the page, saying:

A fruitcake doesn't simply present evidence of policy advice fraud and wonder why you support it:

Author : NikFromNYC (IP: 74.73.163.243 , cpe-74-73-163-243.nyc.res.rr.com)
E-mail : nikwillmore@gmail.com
URL    :
Whois  : http://whois.arin.net/rest/ip/74.73.163.243
Comment:
A fruitcake doesn't simply present evidence of policy advice fraud and wonder why you support it:

http://s6.postimg.org/jb6qe15rl/Marcott_2013_Eye_Candy.jpg

My reputation isn't trashed in public, *yours* is.

There are two major fruitcakes, and they hang out on Steven Goddard's blog, one [deleted. Please learn some self-control - W] who claims the sun is made of iron and World War Three will result if he doesn't get a Nobel Prize, and the other pattern matches fractal coastlines to visible star constellations, claiming that World War Three will result is we don't all immediately reject Darwin, since Ancient Gods made the land and sea. I regularly bash one Steven Goddard for this mad house sponsorship, just as I helped him figure out the fallacy of his own hockey stick of temperature data adjustments that was due to late temperature station reporting. But you? You are psychologically projecting onto your most effective critics, your own faults. I have little to do with it. I'm just the mirror on the wall.

Christ but you are a boring loser

A new comment on the post "Lacis: What is it that determines the terrestrial climate and how it changes?"
http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2014/05/28/lacis-what-is-it-that-determines-the-terrestrial-climate-and-how-it-changes/

Author : LewSkannen
Comment:

christ but you are a boring loser..

WUWT: Pointman’s: The scorning of William Connolley

More weirdness from the denialosphere: still, its all about me, so I can hardly complain about the bat's piss. Come on Shaw-y.

The post is archived here (updated).

I'll add in comments that I find interesting. Including mine, naturally.

Meester

A new comment on the post "Lacis: What is it that determines the terrestrial climate and how it changes?"
http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2014/05/28/lacis-what-is-it-that-determines-the-terrestrial-climate-and-how-it-changes/

Author : Meester

Comment:
poor willy

Mutual

A new comment on the post "Lacis: What is it that determines the terrestrial climate and how it changes?"
http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2014/05/28/lacis-what-is-it-that-determines-the-terrestrial-climate-and-how-it-changes/

Author : Eunice

Comment:

19 -

Mutual.

Are climate scientists being forced to toe the camel?

This is a follow-up to my wildly successful http://stoat-spam.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/the-age-of-unenlightenment-dont-shout.html. That one was to save for a grateful posterity comments that the blog author wasn't allowing past moderation; this one is for comments and tracking of Judith Curry's http://judithcurry.com/2014/05/24/are-climate-scientists-being-forced-to-toe-the-line/. And I should make it clear that, so far, my comments have appeared immeadiately there. But the problem with JC's place is the sheer volume of comments, most of which are junk; so I'll keep a few here to track the bits I care about.

Just in case, there's a webcite at: http://www.webcitation.org/6PpYIj02N.