Friday, 29 May 2015

Potholes In Their Arguments?

No-one can accuse the Watties of being up-to-date; see Potholes In Their Arguments and compare to Fossil fuels subsidised by $10m a minute, says IMF?


  1. William Connolley Your comment is awaiting moderation.
    May 29, 2015 at 10:23 am
    You’re rather late to the party:

  2. William Connolley Your comment is awaiting moderation.
    May 29, 2015 at 12:17 pm
    Plenty of other people got there ahead of you; try for example. Ignorance of prior art is part of what’s holding you lot back.

  3. How fascinating. You, or one of the mods, has faked up my comment. I know this because I kept a copy: I really didn’t think you guys were that desperate.

    The link I provided was to

    > being discharged from Wikipedia

    You really *are* late to the party:

    > here you are to advise us regarding what we’re doing wrong?

    Yes. And your inability to hear is another part of what’s holding you back.

  4. > Like I said, I don’t know the truth in this case, I don’t have a dog in the fight, and William may be 100% correct.

    William is indeed 100% correct. And you can tell that because my comment, here, has now been edited back to the original. So now we know that comments, here, may be silently altered by mods to substantively change their meaning. Talk about Orwellian! I bet you're going to condemn that kind of activity strongly, aren't you?

    How does it feel to be made a fool of by the mods?

    Anyway, that makes most of your response to my comment pointless: have another go.

    You're also wrong about wiki; the mods here simply censored that one; lets try again:

  5. (in reply to Jimmy Finley May 29, 2015 at 7:05 pm)

    William Connolley Your comment is awaiting moderation.
    May 30, 2015 at 12:21 am
    I did reply. The mods censored it. Being “hammered” by WE is like being savaged by a dead sheep. You can read it at if you like.